Title: Akhtar saw Mukkabaaz & said, ‘You don’t like making money’: Anurag
Bollywood has always been a fascinating world of cinema, drama, and controversy. The latest controversy to hit the headlines is about the critically acclaimed film, Mukkabaaz, directed by Anurag Kashyap. The film, which won several accolades, including the National Film Award for Best Feature Film, has been praised for its bold storyline and strong performances. However, what’s surprising is that the renowned poet and screenwriter, Javed Akhtar, had a different opinion about the film.
According to Anurag Kashyap, Javed Akhtar told him that if he had shown Vineet Kumar Singh’s character winning at the end of Mukkabaaz, it would have been a hit. This statement has raised several eyebrows and sparked a debate about the commercial viability of a film versus its artistic merit.
Mukkabaaz, which means “boxer” in Hindi, is a sports drama that tells the story of a young boxer named Shravan Kumar Singh, who is fighting against the corrupt boxing system in India. The film has been praised for its gritty portrayal of the underbelly of Indian sports, where corruption and nepotism are rampant. The film’s protagonist, Shravan, played by Vineet Kumar Singh, is a talented boxer who faces several challenges as he climbs the ladder of success. However, his journey is not a conventional one, and he ultimately loses the fight.
The film’s ending has been a subject of discussion among critics and audiences alike. While some have praised the film’s bold storytelling, others have criticized it for being too bleak and pessimistic. Anurag Kashyap, the director of the film, has explained that he did not want to show Shravan winning at the end of the film because he wanted to highlight the reality of Indian sports. “I wouldn’t have made the film if I had to show Vineet as a winner,” he said in an interview.
The film’s producer, Anurag Kashyap, has also spoken about Javed Akhtar’s comments, saying that he told him, “You don’t like making money.” According to Kashyap, Akhtar was referring to the fact that the film’s ending was not a conventional one, where the hero wins in the end. Kashyap has explained that he did not want to make a film that was commercial and formulaic, but rather a film that told a gritty and realistic story.
Javed Akhtar’s comments about Mukkabaaz have sparked a debate about the commercial viability of a film versus its artistic merit. While some have praised the film for its bold storytelling, others have criticized it for being too bleak and pessimistic. The film’s ending has been a subject of discussion among critics and audiences alike, with some arguing that it is too bleak and others arguing that it is a realistic portrayal of the underbelly of Indian sports.
The debate about the commercial viability of a film versus its artistic merit is an old one in Bollywood. There have been several instances where films that were critically acclaimed did not perform well at the box office, and vice versa. The film industry is a complex and unpredictable one, where success or failure can depend on a variety of factors, including the film’s marketing, the audience’s preferences, and the competition.
In conclusion, Mukkabaaz is a film that has sparked a debate about the commercial viability of a film versus its artistic merit. The film’s ending, which is not a conventional one, has been a subject of discussion among critics and audiences alike. Javed Akhtar’s comments about the film have raised several eyebrows, and have sparked a debate about the importance of making a film that is both commercially viable and artistically merit.
