
Can’t say not my area: TMC MP criticises MP Yusuf Pathan’s absence from Murshidabad
The politics of India is often marred by controversy, and the recent statements made by TMC MP Abu Taher against cricketer-turned-MP Yusuf Pathan are a perfect example of this. The criticism was aimed at Pathan’s absence from the violence-hit Murshidabad district, where he represents the Baharampur Lok Sabha constituency.
Taher, who is a prominent leader of the Trinamool Congress (TMC), lashed out at Pathan, saying that his excuse of “it’s not my area, not my people” was unacceptable. According to Taher, this attitude is not befitting of an elected representative, and he should take responsibility for the welfare of his constituents, regardless of which part of the district they belong to.
Pathan’s absence from Murshidabad has been a subject of criticism from various quarters, including the opposition parties and locals. The district has been witnessing violence and unrest in recent times, with reports of clashes between different groups and allegations of police brutality. The absence of an elected representative, who is supposed to be the voice of the people, has added to the frustration and anger of the locals.
Taher’s criticism of Pathan is not just limited to his absence from the district. The TMC MP has also accused Pathan of being disconnected from the people and not bothering to find out what’s happening on the ground. This, according to Taher, is a serious lapse on the part of a representative, who is supposed to be in touch with his constituents and address their concerns.
The criticism from Taher has been echoed by other TMC leaders, including MLA Humayun Kabir. Kabir has said that if Pathan doesn’t change his behavior and start taking his responsibilities seriously, he will approach the TMC top brass to seek their intervention. This is a strong indication that the party is not happy with Pathan’s performance and is willing to take action if necessary.
The criticism from the TMC is not just limited to Pathan’s absence from Murshidabad. The opposition parties have also been targeting him, accusing him of being absent from the district and not bother to address the concerns of the people. The BJP, in particular, has been vocal in its criticism of Pathan, saying that he is not doing his job and is instead busy with his cricketing career.
The absence of Pathan from Murshidabad is not just a matter of personal criticism. It has serious implications for the people of the district, who are already facing a lot of difficulties due to the violence and unrest. The elected representative is supposed to be the voice of the people, and his absence leaves a power vacuum that can be exploited by anti-social elements.
In conclusion, the criticism of Pathan’s absence from Murshidabad by TMC MP Abu Taher is a timely reminder of the responsibilities of an elected representative. Whether one is the MP of a particular constituency or not, it is the duty of every representative to take care of the people and address their concerns. Pathan’s excuse of “it’s not my area, not my people” is unacceptable, and he needs to take responsibility for the welfare of his constituents.
As the saying goes, ” Politics is not a game of cricket, where one can just walk away from the pitch if the ball is not coming one’s way.” An elected representative is duty-bound to serve the people, regardless of which part of the district they belong to. Pathan needs to take a leaf out of the book of other cricketing legends, who have used their platform to make a positive impact on society.
Sources: