Defamatory & Unacceptable: SCBA on Dubey’s Remark on Judiciary
The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) has issued a resolution condemning the remarks made by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Nishikant Dubey against the judiciary. The SCBA has termed Dubey’s statement as “defamatory” and “unacceptable”, saying that it amounts to contempt of the Supreme Court.
In a recent statement, Dubey had said that the Supreme Court is the only one responsible for inciting religious wars in India. This remark has been widely condemned by the legal fraternity, with many calling it an attack on the institution of the judiciary.
The SCBA resolution states that Dubey’s statement is not only defamatory but also amounts to contempt of the Supreme Court. It says that the Supreme Court is the highest institution of justice in the country, and it is the duty of every citizen to respect and uphold its authority.
The SCBA resolution also expresses concern over the growing trend of political leaders making irresponsible and inflammatory statements. It says that such statements not only undermine the authority of the judiciary but also create a toxic and divisive atmosphere in the country.
The SCBA has urged the government to take immediate action against Dubey and other political leaders who make similar statements. It has also called upon the legal fraternity to come together to defend the institution of the judiciary and to ensure that it remains independent and impartial.
The resolution has been signed by SCBA President, Dushyant Dave, and Secretary-General, Vikas Singh. It is likely to be discussed and adopted by the SCBA executive committee in its next meeting.
The SCBA’s decision to condemn Dubey’s statement is a significant development, as it reflects the growing concerns among the legal fraternity over the increasing attacks on the judiciary. The SCBA has always been a strong advocate for the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, and its decision to condemn Dubey’s statement is a clear indication of its commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting the institution of the judiciary.
In recent years, there have been several instances of politicians making inflammatory and irresponsible statements against the judiciary. However, the SCBA’s decision to condemn Dubey’s statement is significant, as it reflects a growing sense of unease among the legal fraternity over the increasing attacks on the judiciary.
The SCBA’s decision to condemn Dubey’s statement is also significant, as it sends a strong message to politicians and other public figures that they must respect and uphold the authority of the judiciary. The SCBA’s decision is a clear reminder that the judiciary is an independent institution, and that it must be respected and protected at all costs.
In conclusion, the SCBA’s decision to condemn Dubey’s statement is a significant development, as it reflects the growing concerns among the legal fraternity over the increasing attacks on the judiciary. The SCBA’s decision sends a strong message to politicians and other public figures that they must respect and uphold the authority of the judiciary, and it is a clear reminder that the judiciary is an independent institution that must be respected and protected at all costs.
