Irrelevant to discuss Article 370 in J&K Assembly session: BJP
The recent Jammu and Kashmir Assembly session witnessed a stark disagreement between the ruling party and the opposition. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which is the Legislative Party (LoP) in the Assembly, has maintained that it’s irrelevant to discuss Article 370, a contentious issue that has been a subject of debate for years. The BJP MLA, Sunil Sharma, expressed his views on the matter, stating that it would be a waste of time to discuss Article 370 in the Assembly.
In a recent statement, Sunil Sharma, the BJP MLA and LoP in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly, was quoted as saying, “It’s irrelevant now” to discuss Article 370. “It would be a waste of time if we will have the discussion on Article 370 (in the Assembly),” he added. Sharma’s comments came after Jammu and Kashmir Lieutenant Governor (LG) Manoj Sinha delivered his first address to the Assembly, which did not reflect the promises made by the state’s present government, Sharma claimed.
Sharma’s statement has sparked a heated debate, with many interpreting it as a sign of the BJP’s reluctance to engage in discussions on Article 370. The article, which was abolished in 2019, granted special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir, allowing it to have its own constitution and laws. The move was seen as a major step towards integrating the state with the rest of the country.
However, the abolition of Article 370 has been a contentious issue, with many opposing the move, citing concerns about the erosion of the state’s autonomy and the potential impact on the region’s cultural and religious identity. The BJP, on the other hand, has maintained that the move was necessary to ensure national integration and to bring the state on par with the rest of the country.
The BJP’s reluctance to discuss Article 370 in the Assembly is seen as a sign of its commitment to its earlier stance on the issue. The party has consistently maintained that the issue is no longer relevant, given the fact that the article has been abolished. Sharma’s statement is seen as an extension of this stance, with the BJP refusing to engage in discussions that it believes are no longer relevant.
However, opposition parties, including the National Conference and the Congress, have criticized the BJP’s stance, accusing it of trying to suppress debates on the issue. The opposition parties have argued that the abolition of Article 370 has led to a decline in the state’s autonomy and has created uncertainty among the people.
The controversy surrounding Article 370 has been a major issue in Jammu and Kashmir politics for years, with the debate centering around the question of whether the article should be restored or not. The issue has been further complicated by the fact that the state has been under the governor’s rule since 2018, with the BJP playing a key role in the administration.
The BJP’s stance on Article 370 has also been criticized by some sections of society, who argue that the party is trying to impose its views on the people of Jammu and Kashmir. The party’s refusal to engage in discussions on the issue has been seen as a sign of its lack of commitment to the democratic process and its willingness to suppress debates on important issues.
In conclusion, the BJP’s statement that it’s irrelevant to discuss Article 370 in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly session has sparked a heated debate, with many interpreting it as a sign of the party’s reluctance to engage in discussions on the issue. The article, which was abolished in 2019, has been a contentious issue, with many opposing the move, citing concerns about the erosion of the state’s autonomy and the potential impact on the region’s cultural and religious identity. The controversy surrounding Article 370 has been a major issue in Jammu and Kashmir politics for years, and it remains to be seen how the issue will be resolved in the future.
