India Ends Facility for Bangladesh to Export Goods to Other Countries via India
In a move that could have significant implications for Bangladesh’s trade with its neighboring countries, India has decided to end its trans-shipment facility that allowed the export of cargo from Bangladesh to third countries via Indian land customs stations. This decision has been met with concern from Bangladesh, which relies heavily on this facility to export goods to countries such as Bhutan, Nepal, and Myanmar.
According to a government circular, India has ended the facility, citing security concerns and issues related to customs clearance. The move is seen as a significant blow to Bangladesh’s trade and commerce, particularly in the context of the ongoing pandemic and global economic uncertainty.
Bangladesh has been heavily reliant on India’s trans-shipment facility, which allowed it to export goods to countries that do not have direct trade agreements with Bangladesh. The facility was set up in the 1990s and has been a critical component of Bangladesh’s trade strategy ever since. The country’s exports to Bhutan, Nepal, and Myanmar, among others, have been facilitated through this facility, which has helped to boost Bangladesh’s economy and create jobs.
However, the decision by India to end the facility has sent shockwaves through the Bangladeshi trade and commerce community. The country’s interim government, led by Muhammad Yunus, has expressed its concerns over the move and has urged China to consider making Bangladesh’s ocean-facing part an extension of the Chinese economy.
Yunus, who is also the founder of the Grameen Bank, has been a vocal advocate for Bangladesh’s economic growth and development. He has long argued that the country needs to diversify its trade and commerce strategies in order to reduce its dependence on a few key markets. The end of the trans-shipment facility has forced Bangladesh to rethink its trade strategy and explore alternative options.
One of the options being considered by Bangladesh is to use the Chittagong Port, which is one of the country’s busiest ports and handles a significant amount of cargo. The port is located in the southeastern part of the country and is well-connected to the region’s major trade routes. However, the port’s capacity is limited, and it may not be able to handle the volume of cargo that Bangladesh needs to export to other countries.
Another option being considered by Bangladesh is to use the Indian ports of Kolkata and Haldia, which are located in the eastern part of the country. These ports are well-connected to the region’s major trade routes and have the capacity to handle a significant amount of cargo. However, this option may not be viable for Bangladesh, as it would require the country to pay tariffs and other charges to use the Indian ports.
The end of the trans-shipment facility has also raised concerns about the impact on Bangladesh’s economy. The country’s economy has been growing rapidly in recent years, driven by a combination of factors including a growing middle class, increased foreign investment, and a favorable business environment. However, the end of the trans-shipment facility could disrupt this growth and create uncertainty for businesses and investors.
Bangladesh’s trade and commerce community is also concerned about the impact on the country’s relations with India. The two countries have a long-standing trade agreement that allows them to trade goods duty-free. However, the end of the trans-shipment facility has raised concerns about the impact on this agreement and the overall relationship between the two countries.
In conclusion, the decision by India to end its trans-shipment facility for Bangladesh is a significant blow to the country’s trade and commerce strategy. The facility has been a critical component of Bangladesh’s trade strategy for many years, and its end has forced the country to rethink its options. Bangladesh is exploring alternative options, including using its own ports and exploring new trade agreements with other countries. However, the impact of this decision on the country’s economy and relations with India remains to be seen.
Source:
