
Microsoft Offers to Pay Low-Performers to Quit or Join PIP & Risk Termination: Report
In a move to revamp its human resources policy, Microsoft has reportedly offered low-performing staff a choice between quitting and receiving severance or joining a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) and risking termination if their performance doesn’t improve.
According to a Business Insider report, this new policy is part of Microsoft’s “globally consistent” PIP, which aims to provide employees with “clear expectations and a timeline for improvement”. The company’s Chief People Officer (CPO), Amy Coleman, sent an email to employees detailing the new policy.
As per the report, Microsoft will offer low-performing staff a five-day window to decide whether to quit and receive severance or join the PIP. This decision is seen as a significant shift in the company’s approach to dealing with underperforming employees.
Microsoft’s new policy is designed to help employees who are struggling to meet their performance targets. By offering them a choice, the company is trying to provide them with an opportunity to improve their skills and move forward. At the same time, the PIP also serves as a warning to employees who are not meeting expectations, giving them a chance to improve before facing termination.
The PIP is a structured plan that outlines specific goals and objectives for improvement. Employees who join the PIP will be given a clear timeline to meet these objectives, and if they fail to do so, they risk being terminated.
This new policy is a significant departure from Microsoft’s previous approach to dealing with underperforming employees. In the past, the company has been criticized for being slow to address underperformance and for being overly lenient in holding employees accountable for their performance.
Microsoft’s decision to offer low-performing staff a choice between quitting and joining the PIP is seen as a step in the right direction. By providing employees with a clear path forward, the company is demonstrating its commitment to helping them improve and succeed.
However, the new policy has also raised concerns among some employees and industry experts. Some have expressed worry that the PIP is too rigid and may not provide enough flexibility for employees to improve. Others have questioned whether the severance package offered to employees who quit is sufficient.
Despite these concerns, Microsoft’s new policy is seen as a positive move by many. The company’s commitment to providing employees with clear expectations and a timeline for improvement is a welcome change from the ambiguity and uncertainty that often surrounds underperformance.
In conclusion, Microsoft’s decision to offer low-performing staff a choice between quitting and joining the PIP is a significant development in the company’s approach to human resources. While the policy has its pros and cons, it is a step in the right direction towards providing employees with clear expectations and opportunities for growth and improvement.
Source: