CBFC Mutes ‘Prick’ and Abusive Words in ‘Thunderbolts’: Report
The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has been making headlines lately for its strict guidelines and cuts in films. The latest instance is the directorial debut of Jake Schreier, ‘Thunderbolts’. The CBFC has reportedly asked the makers of the film to mute several abusive words, including ‘prick’, ‘ahole’, ‘ds’, ‘bh’, and ‘a**’.
The movie, which was passed with a U/A 13+ rating, has been ordered to make these cuts before its release. The CBFC has been diligent in ensuring that films adhere to its guidelines, and ‘Thunderbolts’ is no exception. The film’s censor certificate also reveals its length to be 2 hours and 7 minutes.
The excessive cuts in ‘Thunderbolts’ are not the first instance of the CBFC exercising its authority. In recent times, several films have faced similar issues, with the CBFC deeming certain content inappropriate for Indian audiences. The board’s guidelines are in place to ensure that films do not promote or glorify violence, obscenity, or other morally reprehensible content.
The CBFC’s decision to mute these abusive words in ‘Thunderbolts’ raises questions about the impact of such cuts on the film’s narrative and overall message. While the intention behind the cuts is to protect young audiences from inappropriate content, it also raises concerns about the film’s artistic integrity.
The CBFC’s guidelines are not without controversy, with many filmmakers and artists expressing their frustration with the board’s strict regulations. The debate surrounding the CBFC’s role in film certification has been ongoing for years, with some arguing that the board’s guidelines are too restrictive and others defending its role in protecting Indian audiences.
In the case of ‘Thunderbolts’, the CBFC’s decision to mute these abusive words may have altered the film’s tone and impact. The film’s makers may have intended to use these words to convey a specific message or tone, but the CBFC’s cuts have effectively censored those elements.
The CBFC’s guidelines are not limited to abusive words, but also cover other forms of content deemed inappropriate. The board’s rules state that films must not depict violence, obscenity, or any other content that may be harmful to society. The CBFC also has the discretion to make cuts or modifications to ensure that films conform to its guidelines.
While the CBFC’s role in film certification is critical, its decisions often spark controversy and debate. The case of ‘Thunderbolts’ is just the latest example of the board’s strict guidelines and cuts in films. As the film industry continues to evolve, the CBFC’s role will remain a topic of discussion and debate.
In conclusion, the CBFC’s decision to mute abusive words in ‘Thunderbolts’ is just another example of the board’s strict guidelines and cuts in films. While the intention behind the cuts is to protect young audiences, it also raises concerns about the film’s artistic integrity. The debate surrounding the CBFC’s role in film certification will continue, but for now, ‘Thunderbolts’ will have to make do with the cuts imposed by the CBFC.
