Calling someone ‘Miyan-Tiyan’ & ‘Pakistani’ not an offence: Supreme Court
In a recent decision that has sparked controversy, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that calling someone “Miyan-Tiyan” and “Pakistani” is in poor taste but does not constitute an offence. The case originated from Jharkhand, where an 80-year-old man was accused of hurling abuses at an Urdu translator.
The incident took place when the accused, an 80-year-old man, allegedly used derogatory language against the Urdu translator, who then filed a complaint against him. The police registered a case against the accused, which eventually reached the Supreme Court.
In its verdict, the Supreme Court dismissed the complaint against the accused, stating that the remarks made by the accused did not amount to hurting the religious sentiments of the translator. The court’s decision has sparked debate among social media users and experts, with some questioning the wisdom of the court’s ruling.
The term “Miyan-Tiyan” is often used as a derogatory term to refer to people of Pakistani origin, particularly in India. The term is considered offensive by many, as it is perceived as a slur against a particular community. Similarly, referring to someone as “Pakistani” can also be seen as an insult, as it is often used to imply that someone is not Indian.
While some may argue that the Supreme Court’s decision is a blow to free speech, others may see it as a necessary step to avoid unnecessary litigation. The court’s decision emphasizes the importance of context and intent behind the words spoken. In this case, the court concluded that the accused did not intend to hurt the translator’s religious sentiments, but rather used the term in a derogatory manner.
The case highlights the complex issue of religious sensitivities in India. With a diverse population and multiple religions, it is essential to be mindful of the language used and avoid using terms that could be perceived as offensive. However, the court’s decision also underscores the need for context and intent behind words. Merely using a certain term does not necessarily constitute an offence.
This ruling is significant, as it sets a precedent for future cases involving religious sensitivities. The court’s decision sends a message that while language must be respectful, it is also important to consider the intent behind the words spoken. This ruling may also help to curb frivolous litigation, as individuals are less likely to file complaints against others for using language that is perceived as offensive.
The debate surrounding the Supreme Court’s decision has also highlighted the need for greater education and awareness about religious sensitivities. In a country with a diverse population, it is essential to be mindful of the language used and avoid using terms that could be perceived as offensive. This can be achieved through education and awareness programs, which can help to promote greater understanding and tolerance among individuals.
In conclusion, while the Supreme Court’s decision has sparked controversy, it is essential to consider the context and intent behind the words spoken. The court’s decision emphasizes the importance of respecting religious sensitivities, while also avoiding unnecessary litigation. As a society, it is essential to promote greater understanding and tolerance, and the court’s decision is a step in the right direction.
