Don’t Assign Work to Justice Varma: SC to Allahabad HC Chief Justice
In a recent development, the Supreme Court has directed Allahabad High Court Chief Justice Arun Bhansali not to assign any judicial work to Justice Yashwant Varma for now. This directive comes after the central government approved the transfer of Justice Varma following a recommendation by the Supreme Court Collegium on March 24.
It is worth noting that on March 14, a large amount of cash was found at Justice Varma’s house, sparking concerns about the propriety of assigning him judicial work. The Supreme Court’s intervention is seen as an attempt to maintain the integrity and independence of the judiciary.
The Supreme Court’s directive is a significant development in the ongoing controversy surrounding Justice Varma. The Allahabad High Court Chief Justice had earlier decided to continue assigning judicial work to Justice Varma despite the central government’s approval of his transfer. However, the Supreme Court’s intervention has put a temporary halt to this decision.
The Supreme Court’s decision to direct the Allahabad High Court Chief Justice not to assign work to Justice Varma is a reminder of the importance of maintaining the highest standards of integrity and propriety in the judiciary. The judiciary is expected to be a beacon of fairness, impartiality, and independence, and any actions that compromise these values are unacceptable.
The controversy surrounding Justice Varma’s transfer began when the central government approved his transfer to the Madhya Pradesh High Court on March 24. However, the Allahabad High Court Chief Justice decided to continue assigning judicial work to Justice Varma, citing the lack of a formal order from the Supreme Court to suspend him.
The Supreme Court’s Collegium, which is responsible for recommending transfers and appointments of judges to the apex court, had recommended Justice Varma’s transfer to the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The Collegium’s recommendation was based on the principle of seniority and rotation, which is followed in the appointment of judges to various high courts.
However, the discovery of a large amount of cash at Justice Varma’s house on March 14 raised serious concerns about his integrity and propriety. The Supreme Court’s intervention is seen as an attempt to address these concerns and ensure that the judiciary is not compromised.
The Supreme Court’s directive to the Allahabad High Court Chief Justice not to assign work to Justice Varma is a temporary measure aimed at maintaining the integrity of the judiciary. It is likely that the Supreme Court will take a final decision on Justice Varma’s transfer in the coming days.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s directive to the Allahabad High Court Chief Justice not to assign work to Justice Varma is a significant development in the ongoing controversy surrounding the judge. The directive is a reminder of the importance of maintaining the highest standards of integrity and propriety in the judiciary, and it is likely to have a significant impact on the functioning of the Allahabad High Court in the coming days.
