Everyone must realise how one suffers: Ex-HC judge Nirmal on acquittal in 17-yr-old case
Justice Nirmal Yadav, a former judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, has finally found closure after being acquitted in the 17-year-old cash-at-judge’s-door case. The case, which made headlines in 2008, involved the alleged delivery of ₹15 lakh cash meant for another judge. In an exclusive interview, Justice Yadav shared her sentiments on the ordeal, stating, “It’s for everyone to realise how one suffers.”
The case, which was a major embarrassment for the judiciary, saw Justice Yadav being booked for allegedly accepting the cash. The controversy led to intense media scrutiny, and the judge’s reputation was severely tarnished. Justice Yadav’s brother, Captain Ajay Yadav, a former Haryana Minister, revealed that his sister had to face immense mental stress due to the case. He said, “She (Nirmal) had to face immense mental stress due to the case. The pressure was immense, and it was affecting her health.”
The acquittal of Justice Yadav is a significant development in the case, which has been pending for nearly two decades. The judge, who retired from service in 2011, had been facing allegations of corruption and misconduct. The acquittal has brought relief to her family, who have been fighting for her reputation and justice.
The cash-at-judge’s-door case was a sensational one, and it sent shockwaves across the legal fraternity. The controversy surrounding the case was so intense that it led to the resignation of two judges, including Justice Yadav’s colleague, Justice Nirmaljit Kaur. The case was also widely covered by the media, with many outlets calling it a “judicial scandal”.
The investigation into the case was conducted by the CBI, which filed a chargesheet against Justice Yadav and several others. The trial was delayed due to various reasons, including the withdrawal of the prosecution’s case against some of the accused. The acquittal of Justice Yadav has left many questions unanswered, and the case is likely to remain a contentious issue for some time.
Justice Yadav’s acquittal has sparked a debate on the judiciary’s handling of the case. Many have questioned the delay in the trial and the apparent lack of effort to investigate the allegations against the judge. The acquittal has also raised concerns about the integrity of the judiciary and the need for greater transparency and accountability.
In the aftermath of the acquittal, Justice Yadav has called for greater understanding and empathy towards those who are accused of wrongdoing. She said, “It’s for everyone to realise how one suffers. The allegation of corruption is a serious one, and it can destroy a person’s life.” Her brother, Captain Ajay Yadav, echoed similar sentiments, saying, “The judiciary should be more sensitive towards the accused. The accused should be given a fair trial, and the allegations should be investigated properly.”
The acquittal of Justice Nirmal Yadav is a significant development in the cash-at-judge’s-door case. The case has highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in the judiciary, as well as the importance of fairness and justice. As Justice Yadav herself has said, “It’s for everyone to realise how one suffers.” The acquittal is a reminder that even the most powerful among us can be wrongfully accused and that justice must be served fairly and impartially.
Source:
