
Irrelevant to Discuss Article 370 in J&K Assembly Session: BJP
The recent Jammu and Kashmir Assembly session has been marked by controversy and debate, with the BJP leadership expressing its opinion on the relevance of discussing Article 370 in the assembly. Sunil Sharma, the BJP MLA and Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the J&K Assembly, has stated that it is “irrelevant now” to discuss Article 370 in the assembly. According to Sharma, having a discussion on Article 370 would be a waste of time.
Article 370 of the Indian Constitution is a contentious topic that has been a subject of debate and controversy for many years. It grants special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir, allowing it to have its own constitution, flag, and autonomy in matters such as taxation, education, and employment. However, the Article has been a source of tension and conflict, particularly in the wake of the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019, which led to the bifurcation of the state into two union territories, Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh.
Sharma’s comments come as a response to the recently concluded assembly session, where Jammu and Kashmir Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha addressed the assembly. According to Sharma, the LG’s address did not reflect the promises made by the present government in the state. He further stated that the government has failed to deliver on its promises, and therefore, it is unnecessary to discuss Article 370, which is no longer relevant in the current context.
The BJP’s stance on Article 370 is a significant development in the ongoing political landscape of Jammu and Kashmir. The party has historically been a strong advocate for the abrogation of Article 370, citing its potential to create divisions and instability in the state. The party’s leadership has consistently argued that Article 370 is a relic of the past, and its continuation is not in the best interest of the state or the nation.
Sharma’s comments have been met with mixed reactions from various political parties and stakeholders in the state. While some have hailed his statement as a bold and pragmatic move, others have criticized it as a sign of complacency and lack of concern for the welfare of the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
The opposition parties in the state have been vocal in their criticism of the government’s handling of the state’s affairs. They have accused the government of failing to deliver on its promises, including the creation of employment opportunities, improvement of healthcare and education infrastructure, and addressing the concerns of the people of the state.
The Indian National Congress (INC) has been particularly critical of the government’s handling of the state’s affairs. The party’s leader, Ghulam Nabi Azad, has accused the government of being insensitive to the needs of the people of Jammu and Kashmir, and of neglecting the state’s development.
The People’s Democratic Party (PDP), another major political party in the state, has also been critical of the government’s handling of the state’s affairs. The party’s leader, Mehbooba Mufti, has accused the government of failing to address the concerns of the people of the state, including the issue of Article 370.
The debate on Article 370 is a complex and sensitive issue, and it is essential to approach it with caution and sensitivity. While the BJP’s stance on the issue may be seen as a pragmatic move, it is crucial to acknowledge the concerns and aspirations of the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
The abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019 was a significant development in the state’s history, and its impact is still being felt today. While the move was seen as a major step towards integrating the state with the rest of the country, it has also been criticized for its potential to create divisions and instability in the state.
The people of Jammu and Kashmir have been affected by the abrogation of Article 370, and it is essential to acknowledge their concerns and aspirations. The government must work towards addressing the issues faced by the people of the state, including the issue of employment, education, and healthcare.
In conclusion, the BJP’s stance on Article 370 is a significant development in the ongoing political landscape of Jammu and Kashmir. While the party has historically been a strong advocate for the abrogation of Article 370, Sharma’s comments have sparked a debate on the relevance of discussing the issue in the assembly.
The debate on Article 370 is a complex and sensitive issue, and it is essential to approach it with caution and sensitivity. The government must work towards addressing the concerns and aspirations of the people of Jammu and Kashmir, and must prioritize their welfare and development.