Title: Irrelevant to Discuss Article 370 in J&K Assembly Session: BJP
The recent Jammu and Kashmir Assembly session has been marked by heated debates and discussions on various issues, but one topic that seems to have taken a backseat is Article 370. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MLA and Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the J&K Assembly, Sunil Sharma, has made it clear that discussing Article 370 in the assembly would be a waste of time.
In his address to the assembly, J&K Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha did not reflect the promises made by the state’s present government, Sharma said. He believes that the LG’s address did not address the burning issues of the people of Jammu and Kashmir, which has left the opposition parties feeling let down.
The BJP MLA’s statement has sent shockwaves across the political spectrum, with many questioning the relevance of Article 370 in the current political scenario. The special status of Jammu and Kashmir, which was granted by the Constitution, was abrogated by the government in August 2019, and many believed that the issue was now closed.
However, Sharma’s statement has reignited the debate on the topic, with many arguing that the assembly should not waste its time on an issue that has been settled. Others believe that the BJP MLA’s statement is a betrayal of the party’s ideology, which has always been critical of Article 370.
The BJP has long been vocal about its opposition to Article 370, and the party’s leaders have often accused the previous government of using the special status to discriminate against the people of Jammu and Kashmir. However, Sharma’s statement has taken many by surprise, as it seems to contradict the party’s stance on the issue.
The opposition parties in the assembly have been quick to pounce on Sharma’s statement, accusing the BJP of backtracking on its commitment to the people of Jammu and Kashmir. The National Conference (NC) and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) have been particularly vocal in their criticism, with NC’s MLA, Mubarak Gul, accusing the BJP of trying to divide the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
The PDP’s MLA, Abdul Haq Khan, has also slammed the BJP for its statement, saying that it was trying to mislead the people of Jammu and Kashmir. “The BJP is trying to create confusion among the people of Jammu and Kashmir by saying that Article 370 is irrelevant,” Khan said. “But the fact is that the special status of Jammu and Kashmir was abrogated by the government, and there is no going back on that.”
The BJP’s decision to back off from discussing Article 370 in the assembly has also been seen as a sign of weakness by many, particularly in the wake of the recent surge in violence in the Valley. The security situation in Jammu and Kashmir has been deteriorating, with several attacks on security forces and civilians in recent weeks.
The government has been accused of failing to address the root causes of the violence, and many believe that the BJP’s statement on Article 370 is an attempt to distract attention from the real issues. The opposition parties have been demanding that the government take concrete steps to address the concerns of the people of Jammu and Kashmir, but the BJP’s statement has been seen as a sign that the government is not serious about addressing the issues.
In conclusion, the BJP MLA’s statement that it is irrelevant to discuss Article 370 in the J&K Assembly session has sparked a heated debate on the topic. While some believe that the issue is now closed, others argue that the assembly should not waste its time on an issue that has been settled. The opposition parties have been quick to pounce on the BJP’s statement, accusing the party of backtracking on its commitment to the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
The government’s decision to back off from discussing Article 370 has also been seen as a sign of weakness in the wake of the recent surge in violence in the Valley. The people of Jammu and Kashmir are demanding that the government take concrete steps to address the concerns of the people, and the BJP’s statement has been seen as a sign that the government is not serious about addressing the issues.
