Irrelevant to Discuss Article 370 in J&K Assembly Session: BJP
The recent Jammu and Kashmir Assembly session has been making headlines, with various political leaders expressing their opinions on the current state of affairs in the union territory. Among the key developments was the statement made by BJP MLA and Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the J&K Assembly, Sunil Sharma. According to Sharma, it is “irrelevant now” to discuss Article 370 in the assembly.
Article 370, which was a key provision of the Constitution that granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir, was abrogated by the Indian government in August 2019. This move sparked widespread protests and controversies, with many arguing that it was a violation of the rights of the people of J&K.
In a recent interview, Sharma reiterated that discussing Article 370 in the assembly would be a waste of time. “It would be a waste of time if we will have the discussion on Article 370 (in the Assembly),” he said. Sharma’s stance is likely to be seen as a significant development, given his position as LoP in the assembly.
However, Sharma’s comments did not stop there. He also expressed his disappointment with the recent address made by J&K Lieutenant Governor (LG) Manoj Sinha in the assembly. According to Sharma, Sinha’s address did not reflect the promises made by the state’s present government.
Sinha’s address was widely anticipated, given the recent developments in J&K. The LG is the constitutional head of the union territory, and his speech is seen as an opportunity to address the concerns and issues faced by the people of J&K.
In his address, Sinha is believed to have highlighted the various initiatives taken by the government to improve the lives of the people of J&K. However, Sharma’s comments suggest that the LG’s speech did not go far enough in addressing the concerns of the people.
It is worth noting that Sharma’s criticism of Sinha’s address is likely to be seen as a reflection of the BJP’s stance on the current state of affairs in J&K. The party has been vocal about its commitment to improving the lives of the people of J&K, and Sharma’s comments are likely to be seen as an attempt to hold the government accountable.
However, the BJP’s stance on Article 370 is also likely to be a factor in Sharma’s comments. The party has been critical of the provision, arguing that it was a source of corruption and misgovernance in J&K. Sharma’s statement that discussing Article 370 in the assembly would be a waste of time is likely to be seen as a reflection of the party’s stance on the issue.
Despite Sharma’s comments, it is likely that the issue of Article 370 will continue to be a contentious topic in the J&K Assembly. The provision was a key aspect of J&K’s special status, and its abrogation has had far-reaching consequences for the union territory.
In the aftermath of the abrogation of Article 370, the Indian government has been working to integrate J&K with the rest of the country. This has included the implementation of various schemes and initiatives aimed at improving the lives of the people of J&K.
However, the integration process has also been marked by controversy and protests. Many have argued that the government’s actions have been driven by a desire to impose its own ideology on J&K, rather than addressing the genuine concerns of the people.
In the face of such challenges, it is likely that the issue of Article 370 will continue to be a key point of contention in the J&K Assembly. Sharma’s statement may have been seen as a reflection of the BJP’s stance on the issue, but it is likely that other political parties will continue to push for greater autonomy for J&K.
In conclusion, Sharma’s statement that it is “irrelevant now” to discuss Article 370 in the J&K Assembly is likely to be seen as a significant development. The provision was a key aspect of J&K’s special status, and its abrogation has had far-reaching consequences for the union territory.
While Sharma’s comments may have been seen as a reflection of the BJP’s stance on the issue, it is likely that other political parties will continue to push for greater autonomy for J&K. The integration process has been marked by controversy and protests, and it remains to be seen how the government will address the concerns of the people of J&K.
As the situation continues to unfold, it is clear that the issue of Article 370 will continue to be a key point of contention in the J&K Assembly. Whether Sharma’s statement is seen as a significant development remains to be seen, but it is likely that the issue will continue to dominate the headlines in the coming weeks and months.
