Irrelevant to Discuss Article 370 in J&K Assembly Session: BJP
The recent session of the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly has been marked by controversy and heated debates, with various political parties expressing their views on the current state of affairs in the region. Amidst the chaos, Sunil Sharma, the MLA and Leader of Opposition (LoP) of the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly, has sparked a fresh debate by stating that it is “irrelevant now” to discuss Article 370 in the Assembly.
Article 370 is a contentious issue that has been at the center of political debate in Jammu and Kashmir for decades. It grants special status to the state, which is not enjoyed by any other state in the country. The BJP government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, had unilaterally scrapped Article 370 in August 2019, which led to widespread protests and unrest in the state.
Sunil Sharma’s statement, made during the ongoing Assembly session, has been met with strong reactions from various quarters. While some have welcomed his views, others have criticized him for being out of touch with the realities on the ground. In an interview, Sharma explained his stance, saying that it would be a waste of time to discuss Article 370 in the Assembly. According to him, the topic has been “politically exploited” in the past, and it is high time that the focus shifted to more pressing issues facing the state.
Sharma’s comments come against the backdrop of Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha’s address to the Assembly, in which he emphasized the need for stability and cooperation in the state. Sinha’s address did not reflect the promises made by the state’s present government, according to Sharma, which has added to the disillusionment among the people.
The BJP MLA also expressed his disappointment over the lack of progress on the economic front, stating that the state’s economy was still struggling to recover from the devastating effects of Article 370’s abrogation. He emphasized the need for a comprehensive economic package to revive the state’s economy and create jobs for the youth.
The statement by Sharma has been seen as a significant development in the ongoing political drama in Jammu and Kashmir. While some have welcomed his views, others have criticized him for being too cautious and unwilling to confront the tough issues facing the state.
Some political analysts have argued that Sharma’s statement is a reflection of the BJP’s dwindling support in the state. The party had made significant gains in the 2019 general elections, but its popularity has been on a downward trend since then. Sharma’s statement may be an attempt to shore up support among the BJP’s core voters, who have been disillusioned by the party’s performance in the state.
On the other hand, some have argued that Sharma’s statement is a sign of the BJP’s growing frustration with the situation in Jammu and Kashmir. The party had touted the abrogation of Article 370 as a major achievement, but the situation in the state has not improved as expected. Sharma’s statement may be a tacit admission that the party’s policies have not yielded the desired results.
The debate over Article 370 is far from over, and Sharma’s statement is likely to spark a fresh round of controversy in the days to come. While some may welcome his views, others will continue to argue that the topic is still relevant and needs to be discussed in the Assembly.
In conclusion, Sunil Sharma’s statement that it is “irrelevant now” to discuss Article 370 in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly has sparked a heated debate in the state. While some have welcomed his views, others have criticized him for being out of touch with the realities on the ground. The controversy is unlikely to die down anytime soon, and it remains to be seen how the BJP MLA’s statement will impact the political landscape in the state.
News Source:
https://x.com/PTI_News/status/1896770915859624200
