
Title: Irrelevant to Discuss Article 370 in J&K Assembly Session: BJP
The Jammu and Kashmir Assembly session has been ongoing, with the ruling government presenting its policies and initiatives to the members. However, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has expressed its opinion that it is irrelevant to discuss the revocation of Article 370 in the current session. Sunil Sharma, a BJP MLA and the Leader of Opposition in the J&K Assembly, was quoted as saying that discussing Article 370 would be a waste of time.
Article 370 of the Indian Constitution granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir, allowing it to have its own constitution, flag, and autonomy. The article was revoked by the Indian government in August 2019, following which the region was divided into two union territories – Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. The revocation of Article 370 was a major controversy, with many opposition parties and political leaders criticizing the move.
Sunil Sharma’s statement comes in the context of the J&K Lieutenant Governor (LG) Manoj Sinha’s address to the assembly. The LG’s address did not reflect the promises made by the state’s present government, Sharma claimed. He further stated that the government’s policies were not in line with the promises made to the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
The BJP MLA’s statement has sparked a debate in the assembly, with many members expressing their opinions on the matter. Some members have argued that discussing Article 370 is necessary to understand the current situation in the region, while others have opposed the move, citing the controversy surrounding the revocation of the article.
The revocation of Article 370 has had far-reaching consequences for the people of Jammu and Kashmir. The region has seen significant changes in the past two years, including the scrapping of the special status granted to the state. The move has been criticized by many political leaders and activists, who argue that it has led to a loss of autonomy and a decline in the region’s economic and social development.
The J&K government has argued that the revocation of Article 370 has brought the region in line with the rest of the country, and has paved the way for greater economic development and integration with the rest of India. However, many critics have argued that the move has been taken without consulting the people of Jammu and Kashmir, and has led to a sense of alienation and disillusionment among the population.
In the midst of this controversy, the J&K LG’s address to the assembly has been seen as an opportunity to address the concerns of the people. However, Sunil Sharma’s statement has raised questions about the relevance of discussing Article 370 in the current session. The BJP MLA’s argument is that the revocation of the article is a fait accompli, and that discussing it would be a waste of time.
However, many members of the assembly disagree with Sharma’s stance. They argue that discussing Article 370 is necessary to understand the current situation in the region, and to address the concerns of the people. The controversy surrounding the revocation of the article has left many questions unanswered, and the assembly session provides an opportunity for the government to address these concerns.
In conclusion, the debate over the relevance of discussing Article 370 in the J&K Assembly session has sparked a controversy in the region. While the BJP MLA has argued that it is irrelevant to discuss the article, many members of the assembly disagree. The revocation of Article 370 has had significant consequences for the people of Jammu and Kashmir, and the assembly session provides an opportunity for the government to address the concerns of the people.