Irrelevant to Discuss Article 370 in J&K Assembly Session: BJP
The recent Jammu and Kashmir Assembly session has sparked a debate with the Leader of Opposition (LoP) and BJP MLA, Sunil Sharma, stating that it is “irrelevant” to discuss Article 370 in the assembly. His statement comes as a surprise, considering the long-standing controversy surrounding the special status of Jammu and Kashmir.
According to Sharma, discussing Article 370 in the assembly would be a waste of time. “It would be a waste of time if we will have the discussion on Article 370 (in the Assembly),” he said. This statement has raised eyebrows, especially among those who have been advocating for the restoration of Article 370.
Article 370, which granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir, was scrapped by the Indian government in August 2019. The move was met with widespread protests and criticism from various quarters. The government had argued that the special status was a hindrance to the development and integration of the state with the rest of the country.
Sunil Sharma’s statement has also been criticized by those who believe that the issue of Article 370 is still relevant and needs to be discussed in the assembly. Many argue that the scrapping of Article 370 has led to a decline in the state’s autonomy and a sense of alienation among the people.
Furthermore, Sharma’s statement seems to contradict the promises made by the Jammu and Kashmir administration. In his address to the assembly, Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha did not reflect the promises made by the state’s present government, Sharma said. This has led to speculation that the government is not committed to addressing the concerns of the people.
The scrapping of Article 370 has had far-reaching consequences for the state. The move has led to a decline in the state’s autonomy, and the people of Jammu and Kashmir are still struggling to come to terms with the changes. The government’s decision has also been criticized for being draconian and ignoring the voices of the people.
The BJP, which is a major party in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly, has been criticized for its handling of the issue. Many argue that the party’s decision to scrap Article 370 was driven by political considerations rather than a genuine desire to address the concerns of the people.
The issue of Article 370 is not just a political controversy but also has significant implications for the people of Jammu and Kashmir. The state has a unique history and culture, and the special status granted to it under Article 370 was seen as a recognition of this distinct identity.
The scrapping of Article 370 has also raised concerns about the future of the state. Many fear that the move will lead to a decline in the state’s autonomy and a sense of alienation among the people. The government’s decision to scrap Article 370 has also been criticized for ignoring the voices of the people and not addressing their concerns.
In conclusion, Sunil Sharma’s statement that it is “irrelevant” to discuss Article 370 in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly session is a controversial one. While the scrapping of Article 370 may have been a significant event, it is still a relevant issue that needs to be discussed and addressed. The government’s decision to scrap Article 370 has had far-reaching consequences for the state, and it is imperative that the people’s voices are heard and their concerns are addressed.
