Opposition Creates Confusion & Leaves House: Rijiju in Rajya Sabha
The recent Rajya Sabha session witnessed a heated debate on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, with Union Minister Kiren Rijiju criticizing senior members of the Opposition for creating confusion and not staying back to listen to the replies. The minister’s remarks came as the House continued to discuss the bill, which aims to amend the Waqf Act, 1995.
According to sources, Rijiju made the comment during the discussions on the bill, where he targeted senior Rajya Sabha member Kapil Sibal for creating confusion by comparing the properties of Waqf bodies with those of other religious bodies. Rijiju’s criticism was in response to Sibal’s statement, which the minister felt was an attempt to mislead the House and create confusion among the lawmakers.
Rijiju’s remarks have sparked a debate on the role of opposition members in the House, with many questioning whether they are truly committed to democratic processes or are simply seeking to create chaos and derail the legislative process. The minister’s criticism has also raised questions about the level of responsibility that opposition members should take when raising issues in the House.
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill is a significant piece of legislation that aims to reform the Waqf system in the country. The bill seeks to empower the Waqf boards to take over the management of Waqf properties and to ensure that these properties are used for the benefit of the community. However, the opposition has been critical of the bill, claiming that it is an attempt by the government to undermine the autonomy of the Waqf boards and to exploit the properties for personal gain.
The debate on the bill has been marked by heated exchanges between the ruling party and the opposition, with both sides accusing each other of trying to mislead the House. Rijiju’s criticism of Sibal was seen as a reflection of the tension that has been building up between the two sides.
The minister’s remarks have also raised questions about the level of responsibility that opposition members should take when raising issues in the House. Rijiju’s criticism of Sibal was seen as a reminder that opposition members have a responsibility to engage in constructive debate and to provide alternative solutions to the problems facing the country, rather than simply seeking to create confusion and chaos.
In conclusion, the debate on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill in the Rajya Sabha has highlighted the need for opposition members to take their responsibilities seriously and to engage in constructive debate. The minister’s criticism of Sibal has also raised questions about the level of responsibility that opposition members should take when raising issues in the House. As the House continues to discuss the bill, it is essential that lawmakers from all sides engage in constructive debate and work towards finding solutions to the problems facing the country.
