Title: Over 83,000 non-state subjects received J&K domicile: State Govt
Introduction:
The Jammu and Kashmir Revenue Department has recently revealed that over 83,000 non-state subjects, also known as ‘non-locals’, have received domicile certificates in the state in the last two years. This information was shared in a written reply to PDP’s Waheed ur Rehman Para, a member of the Jammu and Kashmir legislative assembly. According to the revenue department, a total of 35,12,184 domicile certificates were issued in the last two years. This raises several questions about the government’s stance on domicile certificates and the implications it may have on the state’s demographics.
Background:
The Jammu and Kashmir domicile certificate is a crucial document that grants residency rights to individuals who wish to live and work in the state. The certificate is issued by the state government and is required for various purposes such as opening a bank account, purchasing property, and getting a job. The domicile certificate is categorized into two types: permanent resident certificate and non-permanent resident certificate.
Permanent Resident Certificate (PRC):
The PRC is issued to individuals who are permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir. This certificate is granted to those who have lived in the state for at least 15 years and have a minimum of 10 years’ continuous stay in the state. The PRC is essential for voting rights, government jobs, and other benefits.
Non-Permanent Resident Certificate (NPRC):
The NPRC is issued to individuals who are not permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir. This certificate is granted to those who have lived in the state for less than 15 years. The NPRC is essential for opening a bank account, purchasing property, and getting a job.
Rationale behind the domicile certificate:
The domicile certificate was introduced in 2019 as part of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act. The act aimed to provide residency rights to individuals who had lived in the state for at least 15 years. The domicile certificate was seen as a way to integrate the state’s demography with the rest of the country.
However, the introduction of the domicile certificate has been met with controversy. Many have raised concerns about the impact it may have on the state’s demographics, culture, and identity. Some have argued that the certificate may lead to an influx of outsiders and alter the state’s demographic balance.
Impact of domicile certificates on demographics:
The issuance of domicile certificates to non-state subjects has raised concerns about the state’s demographics. The influx of outsiders may lead to an alteration in the state’s cultural and ethnic balance. The state’s demography may become more heterogeneous, which may have implications for the state’s identity and culture.
Moreover, the domicile certificate may lead to an increase in the state’s population, which may put pressure on its resources. The state’s infrastructure, including housing, education, and healthcare, may become overwhelmed, leading to social and economic issues.
Government’s stance on domicile certificates:
The state government has maintained that the domicile certificate is essential for providing residency rights to individuals who have lived in the state for at least 15 years. The government has argued that the certificate will help to integrate the state’s demography with the rest of the country.
However, the government has also acknowledged that the certificate may have implications for the state’s demographics. In a statement, the state government said that the domicile certificate was introduced to provide residency rights to individuals who have lived in the state for at least 15 years. The government has also emphasized that the certificate will not alter the state’s demography or identity.
Conclusion:
The issuance of domicile certificates to non-state subjects has raised concerns about the state’s demographics, culture, and identity. While the certificate was introduced to provide residency rights to individuals who have lived in the state for at least 15 years, it may have implications for the state’s demographics.
The state government’s stance on domicile certificates is that it is essential for providing residency rights to individuals who have lived in the state for at least 15 years. However, the government has also acknowledged that the certificate may have implications for the state’s demographics.
The controversy surrounding the domicile certificate highlights the complexity of the issue. On one hand, the certificate provides residency rights to individuals who have lived in the state for at least 15 years. On the other hand, it may lead to an influx of outsiders and alter the state’s demographic balance.
As the debate continues, it is essential to strike a balance between providing residency rights to individuals who have lived in the state for at least 15 years and protecting the state’s demographics, culture, and identity.
News Source:
https://thecsrjournal.in/non-state-subjects-received-domicile-certificates-last-two-years-jk-govt/
