Yogi Calls Azmi “Kambakht”, Says “Send Him to UP, We’ll Treat Him”
In a recent controversy, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has sparked a political storm by attacking Maharashtra Samajwadi Party (SP) MLA Abu Azmi for praising the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb. Adityanath, known for his strong Hindutva ideology, did not mince words in his criticism of Azmi, calling him a “Kambakht” and suggesting that he be sent to Uttar Pradesh for treatment.
The controversy began when Azmi, during a debate in the Maharashtra Assembly, praised Aurangzeb, saying that he was a great emperor who had united the country. Azmi’s statement sparked outrage among Hindus, who view Aurangzeb as a symbol of Islamic oppression and persecution of non-Muslims. The SP MLA’s praise for Aurangzeb was seen as an attempt to justify the Mughal emperor’s brutal policies, including the demolition of temples and the forced conversion of Hindus to Islam.
Adityanath, who was speaking in the Uttar Pradesh Assembly, took strong exception to Azmi’s statement. “What kind of person is this Abu Azmi?” Adityanath asked. “He is praising Aurangzeb, the person who destroyed temples and killed innocent people. This person has no right to stay in our country.”
Adityanath’s outburst was seen as a reflection of the growing tensions between the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the SP in the run-up to the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. The BJP has been trying to capitalize on its Hindutva plank to attract voters, while the SP has been trying to counter with its own brand of secularism.
Critics of Adityanath argue that his remarks were irresponsible and divisive, and that they would only serve to further polarize the political landscape in the country. “Adityanath’s comments are a classic example of hate speech,” said a spokesperson for the Congress party. “He is trying to further divide the country on religious lines, and this is not acceptable.”
However, supporters of Adityanath argue that he was simply expressing his outrage at Azmi’s praise for Aurangzeb. “Adityanath has the right to speak out against those who seek to justify the brutal policies of Aurangzeb,” said a spokesperson for the BJP. “He is not trying to divide the country, but rather to promote national unity and pride.”
The controversy has also sparked a debate about the role of history in shaping our understanding of the past. Azmi’s praise for Aurangzeb has been seen as an attempt to rewrite history and erase the atrocities committed by the Mughal emperor. “History is not a matter of personal opinion or political ideology,” said a historian. “It is a record of what happened in the past, and it is our duty to learn from it and not to try to erase it.”
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Adityanath’s remarks on Azmi has highlighted the deep divisions that exist in Indian society. While some see Adityanath’s comments as a reflection of his strong Hindutva ideology, others view them as an attempt to further polarize the political landscape. Whatever the case, it is clear that the controversy will have significant implications for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections and beyond.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch
