
Condemnable & Laughable: BJP as DMK Changes ₹ Symbol in TN Budget
The ongoing debate around language and cultural identity in India has taken a new turn in Tamil Nadu. The state government, led by the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), has decided to change the official rupee symbol ‘₹’ in the state budget to the Tamil letter for “Ru”. This move has sparked a heated reaction from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), with its state president K Annamalai terming it as “condemnable and laughable”.
The controversy surrounds the use of the ₹ symbol, which is commonly used across the country. The DMK government’s decision to replace it with the Tamil letter has been seen as an attempt to assert the state’s cultural identity and promote the use of the Tamil language. However, the BJP has strongly condemned this move, suggesting that it is a divisive step that will only create confusion and complications.
Annamalai, in his reaction to the move, said, “It’s not only condemnable but also laughable that the Tamil Nadu government has decided to change the rupee symbol which is commonly accepted across Bharat. They are either foolish or this shows their immaturity.” He added that the decision will only create chaos and will not serve the interests of the people of Tamil Nadu.
The BJP’s reaction is not surprising, given its long-standing stance on language and cultural issues. The party has consistently advocated for the promotion of Hindi as the national language and has been critical of attempts to promote regional languages. However, the DMK’s decision is seen as a bold move that reflects the state government’s commitment to promoting the Tamil language and culture.
The controversy has also sparked a debate on the role of language in Indian politics. While some argue that language is a critical aspect of cultural identity and should be promoted, others believe that it is a divisive force that can create unnecessary tension and conflict.
In Tamil Nadu, language has long been a contentious issue. The state has a rich cultural heritage and a distinct language and script, which has been a source of pride for the people. However, the Hindi-speaking population in the state has also been demanding more recognition and promotion of the Hindi language.
The DMK’s decision to change the rupee symbol is seen as a response to these demands and an attempt to assert the state’s cultural identity. However, the BJP’s reaction suggests that the party is not willing to accept this move and will continue to advocate for the promotion of Hindi as the national language.
The controversy has also raised questions about the role of the central government in language and cultural issues. While the central government has the power to promote and develop languages, it is ultimately the states that have the power to decide on the official language and symbols.
In this context, the DMK’s decision to change the rupee symbol is a bold move that reflects the state government’s commitment to promoting the Tamil language and culture. While the BJP’s reaction is predictable, it is also a reminder of the need for greater sensitivity and understanding in language and cultural issues.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding the change of the rupee symbol in Tamil Nadu is a reflection of the deeper issues surrounding language and cultural identity in India. While the DMK’s decision is seen as a bold move that reflects the state government’s commitment to promoting the Tamil language and culture, the BJP’s reaction is a reminder of the need for greater sensitivity and understanding in language and cultural issues.
Ultimately, the controversy highlights the need for greater dialogue and cooperation between the central and state governments on language and cultural issues. It also underscores the importance of promoting the use of regional languages and scripts, while also recognizing the need for greater understanding and accommodation of different languages and cultures.