
Defamatory & Unacceptable: SCBA on Dubey’s Remark on Judiciary
The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) has issued a strongly worded resolution condemning the recent remarks made by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey against the judiciary. Dubey’s comments, which have been widely criticized as defamatory and unacceptable, have drawn the ire of the SCBA, which has demanded that the MP retract his statement and apologize for the harm caused to the institution.
In a statement, the SCBA said that Dubey’s remarks, which were made recently, were not only defamatory but also amounted to contempt of the Supreme Court. The association stated that the attack on the judiciary was unacceptable and that it would not be tolerated.
For those who may not be aware, Dubey had recently sparked a controversy by saying that the Supreme Court was responsible for inciting religious wars in India. His comments were widely seen as an attack on the institution and its independence, and were condemned by many across the political spectrum.
The SCBA’s resolution is a strong rebuke of Dubey’s remarks, and sends a clear message that such attacks on the judiciary will not be tolerated. The association has called on Dubey to retract his statement and apologize for the harm caused to the institution.
The SCBA’s stance is not surprising, given the importance of the judiciary in a democracy. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the land, and is responsible for ensuring that the law is upheld and that the rights of all citizens are protected. The institution is built on the principles of independence, impartiality, and integrity, and is expected to remain above politics and outside the fray of partisan squabbles.
Dubey’s remarks, on the other hand, have been widely seen as an attempt to undermine the credibility and authority of the Supreme Court. By saying that the Court is responsible for inciting religious wars, Dubey is implying that the institution is somehow complicit in the perpetuation of communal tensions and violence. This is not only wrong, but also dangerous, as it can lead to a erosion of trust in the institution and undermine the rule of law.
The SCBA’s resolution is a welcome step in the right direction, and sends a clear message that such attacks on the judiciary will not be tolerated. The association’s call for Dubey to retract his statement and apologize is also justified, as it is the right thing to do in the circumstances.
However, the SCBA’s resolution is not just about condemning Dubey’s remarks. It is also about highlighting the importance of the judiciary in a democracy. The Supreme Court is not just a institution, but a symbol of the rule of law and the protection of individual rights. It is the guardian of the Constitution, and is responsible for ensuring that the law is upheld and that the rights of all citizens are protected.
In this context, Dubey’s remarks are not just an attack on the institution, but also a threat to the very foundations of our democracy. By undermining the credibility and authority of the Supreme Court, Dubey is also undermining the rule of law and the protection of individual rights.
The SCBA’s resolution is a reminder that the judiciary is not just a institution, but a vital part of our democracy. It is a reminder that the institution is built on the principles of independence, impartiality, and integrity, and that it is expected to remain above politics and outside the fray of partisan squabbles.
The SCBA’s call for Dubey to retract his statement and apologize is also a reminder that the institution is not just a target for criticism, but also a symbol of the rule of law and the protection of individual rights. It is a reminder that the institution is not just a institution, but a vital part of our democracy, and that it is expected to be treated with respect and dignity.
In conclusion, the SCBA’s resolution on Dubey’s remarks is a welcome step in the right direction. The association’s call for Dubey to retract his statement and apologize is justified, as it is the right thing to do in the circumstances. The resolution is also a reminder of the importance of the judiciary in a democracy, and the need to respect and uphold the institution.
The SCBA’s stance is a reminder that the judiciary is not just a institution, but a vital part of our democracy. It is a reminder that the institution is built on the principles of independence, impartiality, and integrity, and that it is expected to remain above politics and outside the fray of partisan squabbles.
In the end, the SCBA’s resolution is a call to all of us to stand up for the institution and to defend its independence and authority. It is a call to respect and uphold the institution, and to recognize its importance in our democracy.