Defamatory & Unacceptable: SCBA on Dubey’s Remark on Judiciary
The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) has taken a strong stand against the recent remarks made by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey against the judiciary. In a resolution passed by the SCBA, the association has condemned Dubey’s statement, terming it as “defamatory” and “amounting to contempt of the Supreme Court.”
Dubey’s remarks, which have sparked widespread outrage and concern, suggest that the Supreme Court is responsible for inciting religious wars in India. These comments are not only unacceptable but also demonstrate a blatant disregard for the institution of the judiciary and its role in upholding the Constitution and protecting the rights of citizens.
The SCBA’s resolution emphasizes that Dubey’s statement is not only defamatory but also amounts to contempt of the Supreme Court. The association has urged Dubey to retract his statement and apologize for the harm caused to the judiciary and the nation.
The SCBA’s stance is significant, as it reflects the collective voice of the lawyers and advocates who practice in the Supreme Court. The association has a long history of upholding the principles of justice, fairness, and integrity, and its condemnation of Dubey’s remarks is a testament to its commitment to these values.
Dubey’s comments are particularly concerning, as they seek to undermine the authority and credibility of the judiciary. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the land, and its decisions are binding on all citizens. The institution of the judiciary is meant to be independent, impartial, and fair, and any attempt to undermine its authority can have far-reaching consequences for the nation.
It is essential to recognize that the judiciary plays a critical role in protecting the rights of citizens and upholding the Constitution. The Supreme Court has a long history of upholding the rights of marginalized communities, protecting the Constitution, and ensuring that the government acts in accordance with the law.
Dubey’s remarks are also concerning, as they reflect a broader trend of undermining the institution of the judiciary. There have been several instances in recent times where the judiciary has been targeted, and its authority and credibility have been questioned. This trend is not only unacceptable but also dangerous, as it can lead to a breakdown of the rule of law and the erosion of democratic institutions.
The SCBA’s resolution is a timely reminder of the importance of respecting the institution of the judiciary and upholding the principles of justice and fairness. The association’s condemnation of Dubey’s remarks is a testament to its commitment to these values, and its stance is likely to send a strong message to those who seek to undermine the authority of the judiciary.
In conclusion, the SCBA’s resolution condemning Dubey’s remarks is a timely and necessary response to a dangerous trend of undermining the institution of the judiciary. The association’s stance is a testament to its commitment to upholding the principles of justice, fairness, and integrity, and its condemnation of Dubey’s remarks is a reminder of the importance of respecting the authority and credibility of the judiciary.
