Defamatory & Unacceptable: SCBA on Dubey’s Remark on Judiciary
In a shocking display of disrespect and disregard for the institution of the judiciary, BJP MP Nishikant Dubey recently made a statement that has left many in the legal fraternity reeling. Dubey, in a remark that has been widely condemned, stated that the Supreme Court is responsible for inciting religious wars in India. This statement has been roundly criticized by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), which has issued a resolution condemning Dubey’s remarks.
The SCBA, in its resolution, described Dubey’s statement as “defamatory” and “unacceptable”. The association emphasized that this attack on the judiciary is not only unacceptable but also amounts to contempt of the Supreme Court. The SCBA’s stance is clear: such comments are not only damaging to the institution of the judiciary but also undermine the rule of law and the principles of democracy.
Dubey’s statement, which has sparked widespread outrage, is a grave concern for the legal community and the general public alike. As a Member of Parliament, Dubey has a responsibility to uphold the values of democracy and respect the institutions of the land. Instead, his statement has been widely seen as an attempt to undermine the authority of the judiciary and discredit the institution.
The SCBA’s resolution is a welcome step in condemning Dubey’s remarks and sending a strong message that such behavior is unacceptable. The association’s stance is not only a defense of the judiciary but also a reminder that public servants have a responsibility to uphold the values of democracy and respect the institutions of the land.
The SCBA’s condemnation of Dubey’s statement is not just a reaction to his personal views but also a defense of the institution of the judiciary. The judiciary is an essential pillar of democracy, and it is the duty of all citizens, including public servants, to respect and uphold its authority. Dubey’s statement, by implication, suggests that the judiciary is not doing its job properly and is somehow responsible for the religious tensions in the country.
This is not only a gross misinterpretation of the judiciary’s role but also a dangerous and divisive statement. The judiciary is an independent institution, and its role is to uphold the Constitution and ensure that the rights of all citizens are protected. The judiciary does not have the power to incite religious wars or any other form of violence. Instead, it is the duty of the judiciary to ensure that the law is upheld and that the rights of all citizens are protected.
The SCBA’s resolution is a timely reminder that public servants, including Members of Parliament, have a responsibility to uphold the values of democracy and respect the institutions of the land. It is not enough for public servants to simply mouth empty platitudes about the importance of democracy and the rule of law. Instead, they must take concrete actions to uphold these values and respect the institutions that are essential to democracy.
In conclusion, the SCBA’s condemnation of Dubey’s statement is a welcome step in defending the institution of the judiciary and upholding the values of democracy. It is essential that public servants, including Members of Parliament, recognize the importance of respecting the institutions of the land and upholding the values of democracy. Anything less would be unacceptable and would undermine the very fabric of our society.
