Digvijay Singh Questions Shah Over 2002 Gujarat Riots, He Responds
The Rajya Sabha recently witnessed a heated argument between Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Congress MP Digvijay Singh. The discussion began when Singh questioned Shah about his role during the 2002 Gujarat riots. The incident has sparked a lot of debate and controversy, with many asking about Shah’s involvement and responsibility in the matter.
The 2002 Gujarat riots were a series of violent incidents that took place in the state of Gujarat, India, in 2002. The riots were sparked by the Godhra train burning incident, in which a coach of the Sabarmati Express train was set on fire, killing 59 people, most of whom were Hindu pilgrims. The incident was widely condemned, and many blamed the Muslim community for the attack.
The riots that followed were marked by widespread violence, loot, and arson, with many Muslims being targeted by Hindu mobs. The violence resulted in the deaths of over 1,000 people, mostly Muslims, and the displacement of thousands more. The Gujarat riots were widely condemned by human rights groups and governments around the world, and the Indian government was criticized for its handling of the situation.
During the recent session in the Rajya Sabha, Digvijay Singh questioned Amit Shah about his role during the 2002 Gujarat riots. Singh accused Shah of being involved in the riots and claimed that he was responsible for the violence that took place. Shah responded to Singh’s accusations, saying that he was not the Home Minister at the time of the riots.
“When the riots happened, I was not the Home Minister. I took office eighteen months after they had ended,” Shah said. He also claimed that he had nothing to do with the riots and that he was not involved in any way.
Singh, however, was not convinced by Shah’s response and accused him of being involved in the riots. He claimed that Shah had a role in the riots and that he was responsible for the violence that took place. Singh’s accusations were met with strong resistance from Shah and his supporters, who claimed that they were baseless and lacked evidence.
The debate between Singh and Shah has sparked a lot of controversy and debate, with many asking about Shah’s involvement and responsibility in the matter. The incident has also raised questions about the role of the Indian government in the 2002 Gujarat riots and the measures that were taken to prevent and control the violence.
The 2002 Gujarat riots were a major crisis for the Indian government, and the government was widely criticized for its handling of the situation. The government was accused of being slow to respond to the violence and of failing to take adequate measures to prevent and control the riots. The incident also raised questions about the role of the Indian police and the judiciary in the matter.
The debate between Singh and Shah has also raised questions about the role of the Indian government in the 2002 Gujarat riots and the measures that were taken to prevent and control the violence. The incident has also raised questions about the role of the Indian police and the judiciary in the matter.
In conclusion, the debate between Digvijay Singh and Amit Shah over the 2002 Gujarat riots has sparked a lot of controversy and debate. The incident has raised questions about Shah’s involvement and responsibility in the matter and has also raised questions about the role of the Indian government in the 2002 Gujarat riots and the measures that were taken to prevent and control the violence.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch
