Opposition Creates Confusion & Leaves House: Rijiju in Rajya Sabha
The ongoing debates in the Rajya Sabha have taken a new turn with Union Minister Kiren Rijiju sharply criticizing senior members of the Opposition for creating confusion and raising issues in the House, only to walk out without listening to the replies. Rijiju made these remarks during the discussions on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill.
The Union Minister’s outburst came after senior Congress leader Kapil Sibal raised concerns about the properties of Waqf bodies being compared to those of other religious bodies. Sibal’s comparison had sparked a heated debate, with Rijiju taking umbrage at the manner in which the senior MP had presented his argument.
Rijiju’s criticism of Sibal and other Opposition members was far from subtle. He accused them of creating confusion and then leaving the House without staying to hear the replies. The Minister’s words were clearly aimed at highlighting the lack of seriousness with which the Opposition was approaching the debate.
It is not uncommon for the Opposition to raise provocative questions and then walk out of the House without staying to hear the replies. This tactic is often employed to create a media flutter and garner public attention. However, Rijiju’s criticism is significant because it highlights the lack of substance in the Opposition’s approach.
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill is a critical piece of legislation that seeks to revamp the functioning of Waqf bodies across the country. The Bill aims to ensure transparency and accountability in the management of Waqf properties, which are sacred institutions that provide essential services to millions of Indians.
The Bill has been widely praised for its potential to bring about a significant improvement in the functioning of Waqf bodies. However, the Opposition has been raising concerns about the Bill, claiming that it will lead to the erosion of Muslim rights and the takeover of Waqf properties by the government.
Rijiju’s criticism of the Opposition’s approach is justified because it is clear that they are more interested in scoring political points than in engaging in a meaningful debate on the Bill. The Minister’s words were a reflection of the frustration that many members of the ruling party must be feeling about the way the Opposition is conducting itself.
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill is not the only piece of legislation that has been the subject of controversy in the Rajya Sabha. The House has been witnessing heated debates on several other Bills, including the Triple Talaq Bill and the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill.
In each of these cases, the Opposition has been using similar tactics to create confusion and then walk out of the House without staying to hear the replies. This approach is not only unproductive but also damaging to the reputation of the House.
Rijiju’s criticism of the Opposition’s approach is a timely reminder of the need for a more constructive and respectful engagement in the House. The Minister’s words are a call to the Opposition to revisit their strategy and engage in a more meaningful debate on the issues.
In conclusion, Rijiju’s criticism of the Opposition for creating confusion and leaving the House without staying to hear the replies is well-timed and justified. The Minister’s words are a reflection of the frustration that many members of the ruling party must be feeling about the way the Opposition is conducting itself.
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill is a critical piece of legislation that has the potential to bring about a significant improvement in the functioning of Waqf bodies. It is imperative that the Opposition engages in a more constructive and respectful debate on the Bill, rather than using tactics that create confusion and damage the reputation of the House.
