
Opposition Creates Confusion & Leaves House: Rijiju in Rajya Sabha
The recent proceedings in the Rajya Sabha have been marked by a significant amount of debate and discussion on various bills, including the Waqf (Amendment) Bill. However, the debate has also been marred by accusations of creating confusion and not staying back to listen to replies. Union Minister Kiren Rijiju, who was participating in the discussions on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, made a scathing attack on senior Rajya Sabha members for creating confusion and not staying back to listen to the replies.
Rijiju’s remarks were directed at senior member Kapil Sibal, who had compared the properties of Waqf bodies with those of other religious bodies during the debate. Rijiju accused Sibal of creating confusion by making such a comparison, and said that he was not staying back to listen to the replies. “He created confusion, but he did not stay back to listen to the replies,” Rijiju said.
Rijiju’s comments were seen as a response to Sibal’s remarks, which had sparked a heated debate in the House. Sibal had argued that the Waqf (Amendment) Bill was aimed at promoting communal harmony, and that it was necessary to ensure that Waqf properties were not used for any other purpose. However, Rijiju disagreed with Sibal’s views, and accused him of creating confusion by making comparisons with other religious bodies.
Rijiju’s attack on Sibal was not the only instance of the Union Minister criticizing senior members of the Rajya Sabha. He also accused them of not staying back to listen to the replies, and of creating confusion by raising unnecessary issues. “They create confusion, but they do not stay back to listen to the replies,” Rijiju said.
Rijiju’s comments have sparked a heated debate in the House, with many members accusing him of being biased and of not staying back to listen to the replies. However, Rijiju has maintained that his intention was to clarify the issues and to ensure that the House functions smoothly.
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill is aimed at promoting communal harmony and ensuring that Waqf properties are used for the benefit of the community. The bill seeks to amend the Waqf Act, 1995, and to ensure that Waqf properties are managed and maintained in a transparent and accountable manner.
The bill has been opposed by many members of the Rajya Sabha, who have argued that it is aimed at promoting communal harmony and that it is necessary to ensure that Waqf properties are used for the benefit of the community. However, Rijiju has maintained that the bill is aimed at promoting communal harmony and that it is necessary to ensure that Waqf properties are used for the benefit of the community.
In conclusion, the recent proceedings in the Rajya Sabha have been marked by a significant amount of debate and discussion on various bills, including the Waqf (Amendment) Bill. However, the debate has also been marred by accusations of creating confusion and not staying back to listen to replies. Union Minister Kiren Rijiju has made a scathing attack on senior Rajya Sabha members for creating confusion and not staying back to listen to the replies. Rijiju’s comments have sparked a heated debate in the House, with many members accusing him of being biased and of not staying back to listen to the replies.