
Stalin Drowned in Corruption, TN People Against Him: Kishan Reddy
Union Minister G Kishan Reddy has sparked controversy by making a scathing attack on Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin, stating that he is “completely drowned in corruption”. Reddy made these remarks while reacting to Stalin-led Joint Action Committee meeting on the delimitation issue. The meeting, which was attended by 14 leaders from five states, was seen as a move by Stalin to blame the BJP for the state’s issues.
Reddy, who is also a BJP leader, stated that the people of Tamil Nadu are against Stalin and his politics. He accused Stalin of using the meeting as an opportunity to deflect attention from his own government’s failures and shift the blame on the BJP. Reddy’s comments have sparked a heated debate, with many questioning the Union Minister’s motives and whether he was trying to polarize the state’s voters.
The Joint Action Committee meeting was convened by Stalin to discuss the delimitation issue, which has been a contentious topic in the state for some time. The meeting was attended by leaders from the DMK, Congress, CPI(M), CPI, and the Left parties. The participants in the meeting alleged that the BJP government at the Centre was trying to disrupt the delimitation process and impose its own agenda on the state.
Reddy, however, dismissed the allegations and said that Stalin was trying to mislead the people of Tamil Nadu. He stated that the Centre was committed to the delimitation process and was willing to work with all parties to ensure its success. Reddy also accused Stalin of using the meeting to divert attention from his government’s failures in areas such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure development.
The BJP leader’s comments have been met with criticism from opposition parties, who have accused him of trying to polarize the state’s voters and create divisions between different communities. The DMK, in particular, has been vocal in its criticism of Reddy’s remarks, stating that he has no right to question Stalin’s integrity and that the Union Minister’s comments were an attempt to deflect attention from his own party’s failures.
Despite the backlash, Reddy has stuck to his guns and reiterated his accusations against Stalin. He stated that the people of Tamil Nadu are aware of Stalin’s corruption and are not buying his rhetoric. Reddy also accused Stalin of being a “weak” leader who is unable to tackle the state’s problems effectively.
The controversy surrounding Reddy’s remarks has raised questions about the political climate in Tamil Nadu and the role of the Centre in the state’s politics. While some have accused Reddy of trying to polarize the state’s voters, others have seen his comments as a reflection of the growing frustration among the people of Tamil Nadu with the state’s politics.
The delimitation issue has been a contentious topic in the state for some time, with different parties having different views on how it should be handled. The Centre has been keen to push forward with the delimitation process, while the state government has been resisting the move. The controversy surrounding Reddy’s remarks has raised questions about the future of the delimitation process in the state.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Reddy’s remarks has highlighted the deep divisions in Tamil Nadu politics. While Stalin and his allies have accused Reddy of trying to polarize the state’s voters, Reddy has stuck to his guns and reiterated his accusations against Stalin. The controversy has also raised questions about the Centre’s role in the state’s politics and the future of the delimitation process.