What does Vadra know about Hindutva: Relative of man killed in J&K
The recent comments made by Robert Vadra, husband of Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi, have sparked outrage and criticism across the country. Vadra had stated that “Muslims are feeling weakened in India”, which has been seen as a divisive and communal remark. A relative of Manjunath Rao, a Karnataka-based man who was killed in the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, has come forward to condemn Vadra’s statement and question his understanding of Hindutva.
Manjunath Rao was one of the 10 people killed in the terror attack in Pahalgam, which has shaken the nation. His family and loved ones are still reeling from the loss, and his relative, who wishes to remain anonymous, has spoken out against Vadra’s comments. In an interview with a leading news channel, the relative expressed his disappointment and anger at Vadra’s statement.
“What does he know about Hindutva?” the relative asked. “This was not expected from him. Terrorists don’t have any religion. He should take his words back.”
The relative’s words are a stark reminder of the divisive nature of Vadra’s comments. By implying that Muslims are feeling weakened in India, Vadra is perpetuating a narrative that pits one community against another. This is a dangerous game, and one that can lead to further polarization and violence in society.
The relative’s criticism of Vadra is not just limited to his comments on Hindutva. He also takes issue with Vadra’s lack of understanding of the terror attack in Pahalgam. “He should have condemned the attack and expressed solidarity with the victims and their families,” the relative said. “Instead, he chose to make divisive comments that only serve to fuel hate and violence.”
This is not the first time that Vadra has been criticized for his comments on sensitive issues. In the past, he has faced backlash for his statements on topics such as Kashmir and nationalism. However, his recent comments on Hindutva have sparked a fresh wave of outrage and criticism.
The timing of Vadra’s comments is also significant. The terror attack in Pahalgam occurred just days before his remarks, and it is clear that he was trying to capitalize on the emotions and fears of the incident. This is a cynical and opportunistic move, and one that is beneath the standards of a public figure.
The relative’s words are a reminder that we need to be vigilant against divisive rhetoric and communal polarization. We need to stand together as one nation, and reject the attempts of individuals like Vadra to drive us apart.
In conclusion, Robert Vadra’s comments on Hindutva are a disturbing and divisive statement that has sparked outrage and criticism across the country. His relative, who lost a loved one in the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, has spoken out against Vadra’s statement and questioned his understanding of Hindutva. We need to stand together and reject the attempts of individuals like Vadra to fuel hate and violence in society.
